Publications: The Petroleum Economics Monthly
Really Understanding Oil Markets -- The 2013 Version (January 2013)
The standard fiction regarding oil markets put forward by forecasters at the International Energy Agency and the Energy Information Administration and by academics ties oil price movements to changes in aggregate consumption. The growth of oil use in China is important to these individuals. The surplus capacity of oil-exporting countries is also important to their macro analyses. These studies can be frustrating to those familiar with the market’s details, though, because the IEA, EIA, and academic writers seem unwilling to dig beyond data they can easily download. In “Really Understanding Oil Markets – The 2013 Version,” we examine all the factors that contribute to oil prices. In doing so, we argue that the academic studies are more fiction that fact. We suggest that the world’s consumers in 2013 may pay as much as $1 trillion more for petroleum than they would have had academics paid closer attention to market structure.
To read more, please view the summary PDF provided here. To request subscription information for The Petroleum Economics Monthly, please Contact Us or send us an Information Request.
- The Petroleum Economics Monthly
- The Failure of Traditional Oil Market Fu...
- Will Investor Aversion Bring Higher Oil ...
- The Hedge Fund War on Fracking (August 2...
- IMO 2020: Implications for Crude (Januar...
- Understanding Price Behavior During Oil ...
- $200 Crude, the Economic Crisis of 2020,...
- IMO 2020: Economic Prospects (June/July ...
- Brent Is Dated (November/December 2017)
- The United States: Center of the Global ...
- A Tale of Two Markets (September 2017)
- The Triumph of Markets (August 2017)
- Twilight of Big Energy (July 2017)
- Failure to Learn from History: The Produ...
- A Lesson in Disruption (May 2017)
- Putting a Finger in the Oil Market Dike ...
- Oil's Johnny One-Note (March 2017)
- The Don Quixotes of Oil (February 2017)
- Markets Take Over (January 2017)